I don't think his audience cares. Which means they still tune in, which
still makes him incredibly marketable, which means the advertising dollars
are still there, which means he gets to keep on rolling.

Don't think for a second that Imus' fall was the result of any moral
epiphany by his employers. He was canned simply because his profitability
could no longer outweigh his liability.

Rush will continue until he suffers that same fate, or retires.

On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i am quite sure you are right concerning Rush being untouchable.  look
> at his drug issue.  I'm not saying he should lose his job or even be
> taken to task. I'm not sure his drug issue was that different than Bret
> Favre's.   However, he has a very different perspective on his drug use
> than on others drug use.  He does seem to come across as holier than thou.
>



-- 
Withdrawal in disgust is not the same as apathy.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & 
Flex 2
Free Trial 
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:235372
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to