> In other words it's not that CF can't do the job or that CF isn't used: it's that Adobe's > consulting services are no match for IBM and MS. CF is also hamstrung in a lot of ways by > it's price: it's too cheap. I've been told right out that CF "isn't expensive enough to > be enterprise capable".
Yes, Jim, it *is* that CF can't do the job. It's not just pure ASP.NET versus CF, really; it's the entire .NET platform versus CF + Flex + anything else Adobe wants to pull out of its ass. Have you seen (from the inside) what you can do with SharePoint and ASP.NET? Or Workflow Foundation and ASP.NET? It all dovetails beautifully with ASP.NET to create some pretty amazing stuff. And the development environment is awesome. And it's all *free*! We're working on an exciting workflow system using Workflow Foundation hosted on ASP.NET. We'd been so accustomed to dealing with the problems and shortcomings of CF for so long that we were numb to it. When we saw what was possible with .NET, our future became very clear (and promising). Remember: only one seat left in our June 4th class! ;) Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# & ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:235511 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
