On 5/24/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it really isn't about Clinton vs Bush, then why not compare numbers > of deaths under Reagan (17201 twice as many as Bush 2...hrmmmm) or > Bush the first (6223 only 2/3 of Bush 2 in 2/3 the time!) to Bush 2: > Electric Bugaloo?
Why not go back 100 years? Think about that a bit. > So really, can I take your claim of "not Clinton vs. Bush" seriously? > > Then I guess you made the opening statement "More died before the war" > by accident? You were simply hoping everyone would just trust your > numbers? I made a mistake and corrected it in the following post. I was wrong, sorry. Will that do? > and now that your numbers have been shown to be skewed you're going to > back out of the ring? Not at all, my point is still very valid. You're in another one of your childish attack modes and that's what I'm not in the mood for. > okay. see you later Sam... next time I'll be sure to ask if you're > ready to play when you make a supposition like the above. Good idea. > > go sit in the corner with Dana. > > you're giving me a time out for being right? cool. Keep thinking that ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:235533 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
