> gMoney wrote: > The Bush administration's crimes against the scientific community, and > ANYONE who loves true knowledge, are so blatant and infuriating
Which is why I agree with Newt Gingrich on a number of things, but the greatest is the lesson from the French: Just as Sarcozy came from inside the gov't, but ran as the candidate of change, so must the Republican candidate to win. The next election will be about who's most unlike Bush, but can fight the 'war on terror'. Right now, it's not a war, but it could might become one, and in the meantime it's a gotta be a badarse cold war (meaning lots of "black" ops and a focus on infiltration and 'humint'). Gingrich seems to understand, more than anyone I've heard recently, that: 1.) There is a HUGE problem here - where's the Islamic outrage about a group willing to murder South Korean missionaries that are there to help their country? There is a cultural problem. 2.) Fighting that kind of enemy can't be done while we're bogged down in a civil war, nor by cutting the military or bringing everyone home. 3.) The tactics, and maybe the strategy, have to change constantly and therefore must be disassociated with ideology (Bush's so-called democratic imperialism). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:239671 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
