Actually it was four versions of the same article. She only asked for one.

Do you think they fact that the earth isn't cooking will cause them to
go back and change these papers?

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/08/09/did-media-or-nasa-withhold-climate-history-data-changes-public


On 8/9/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cluster=2895724914451169384
> >Enjoy
> >
>
> Merely four articles. lousy. If that's your research then if it were a basic 
> research course you'd fail, this one
>
> http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=global+warming+detractor&num=100&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=bio&as_subj=chm&as_subj=eng&as_subj=phy&hl=en&lr=
>
> using global warming and detractor as the keywords came up with 2, but I 
> limited the search to hard science areas, like physics, biology, etc.
>
> Global warming cause, again limiting it to physics biology etc,
> http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&q=global+warming+cause&btnG=Search&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=bio&as_subj=chm&as_subj=eng&as_subj=phy
> 'Results 1 - 100 of about 30,100 for global warming cause. (0.21 seconds) "
>
> Same search with human added to the keyword search
> http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&q=global+warming+human+cause&btnG=Search&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=bio&as_subj=chm&as_subj=eng&as_subj=phy
> Results 1 - 100 of about 17,700 for global warming human cause. (0.21 seconds)
>
> Now I only looked at the first 25, but only one was negative, and that was a 
> commentary on an article not research.
>
> I think that the consensus from the scientific community is very clear, 
> humans are changing the climate and making the world considerably warmer than 
> it has been for thousands of years.
>
> An very very small minority who are mostly sponsored by industries who would 
> be harmed by measures designed to combat global warming do not balance out 
> the hard science.
>
> If its a choice between politics and what the scientific data dictate, I'll 
> dump the politics. As anyone who as had even a tiny bit of training in the 
> sciences know, the data dictate your conclusions, not one's ideology.
>
> That is of course one follows some form of faith-based "science."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Get the answers you are looking for on the ColdFusion Labs
Forum direct from active programmers and developers.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid-72&catid=648

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:239902
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to