> On 8/22/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >so what is xhtml? > > >why should i use it? > > >what is needed to use it? > > > > Here's a good one, XHTML with a CSS layout loads 3 - 5 times faster > than an HTML layout. > > I would think that's primarily due to the introduction of the CSS, > moreso than the difference between the HTML and XHTML. > > is XHTML itself any more lightweight than HTML? I wouldn't think so. > > I do use (and endorse the use of) XHTML over HTML. Similarly i > endorse the use of CSS for layout. Just seems that the speed > argument > is more a part of the "css vs tables-for-layout" debate? > > -- > Charlie Griefer
http://www.twoninemedia.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/4/19/TabledLayoutsvsCSSLayouts from the blog: The CSS-based layout was 33% FASTER than the table-based layout on a T1 connection, and 59% FASTER on a 56K connection. The layout in this case was strict xhtml using a css layout while the other used a table table layout (ie., html 4.01). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product development sharing, and articles on the Adobe Labs wiki. http://labs/adobe.com/wiki/index.php/ColdFusion_8 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:241154 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
