> Dana wrote: > yes but the New England Journal od Medicine published it. I dfind it > interesting that a rather conservative industry publication would do > that. And yes, I do realize that this paradigm offends your > ideological stance on the subject ;) >
My point was that it was an editorial by a PoliSci prof and that his solution was full of holes. As I said, his Medicare point is very valid, but his solution rests on "good private coverage" which would not exist. It doesn't now! So nothing ideological about that, just facts. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder, plug-ins for Eclipse and Dreamweaver updates. http;//www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs%5adobecf8%5Fbeta Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:241656 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
