Why?

Because of the number of non-conforming.  

The number of highly intelligent people that come from lower intelligence
(appearing) parents.  The number of 'seemingly' lower intelligent people
coming from highly intelligent parents.  

So, 'Can you determine an 'intelligence level' based upon the human genome
structure?' --  I am guessing that you probably can.
Then, 'Can you determine an 'intelligence level' based upon the skin color
of an individual?'.  No.
If the first is true, then it is controlled by the genes, and another
genetic trait would not suppress the other.  Race is a result of a
combination of genes, not a single gene.  As you said...  'curly hair'.
Well, I know a lot of black people who have curly hair and a number of Irish
people who have it as well.  

As someone else mentioned.  Some cultures have an anti-intelligence
structure.  Which can/has suppressed many person's intelligence.  The
capacity is there, but the use is not.  This does not mean that any number
of individuals from those culture communities may not 'break' from the norm
and explore their intelligence. And who are we (you!) to judge them for
their efforts?

William

-- 
William E. Seiter
 
Have you ever read a book that changed your life?
Go to: www.winninginthemargins.com
Enter passkey: goldengrove
 
Web Developer 
http://William.Seiter.com

Gruss wrote:

What I'm saying makes much more sense:

(1.) "intelligence" is 100% determined by genetics.

(2.) We can create taxonomies to describe genetic traits: black
people, curly haired people, Packer's fans.

(3.) It's 100% likely that a certain code of genes gives you certain
mental abilities.  We could group them all up and call them
"intelligence" or we could split them up and call them "emotional
intelligence", "language intelligence", etc.

Therefore, depending on the taxonomies we create, we could create a
probability structure based on a population survey that would give a
probably of an individual having trait X given that they have trait Y.

Or we could just all admit that an Augustinian priest has done this
100 years ago with pea plants and be done with it.

Why is it so damn hard for people to admit that their intelligence is
genetically determined and that it may be tied to other genetic traits
like number of moles or length of fingers.

For some reason if you imply that it might be skin color, as Dr.
Watson did, people freak out.  Seems just a likely as anything else to
me.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Enterprise web applications, build robust, secure 
scalable apps today - Try it now ColdFusion Today
ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:245348
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to