I wonder, what *exactly:" makes it sound like "solid science" to you?
And I wonder, last year when the BBC reported this same non-story, did seem "solid science" then as well? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm > > WillBo wrote: > > But if this is the same "split" story that's been going around for a > > while now, it's total bullshit. > > > > I dunno ... This sounds like solid science to me: > > Men will have symmetrical facial features, deeper voices and bigger > penises, according to Curry in a report commissioned for men's > satellite TV channel Bravo. > > Women will all have glossy hair, smooth hairless skin, large eyes and > pert breasts, according to Curry. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Enterprise web applications, build robust, secure scalable apps today - Try it now ColdFusion Today ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:245378 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
