who cares what the Wall Street Journal editorial page has to say :) Its news reporting *has been* balanced (tho Murdoch may change this).... its editorial page has not. Based on my reading on the topic, military intelligence had a lot of input into that estimate.
What the heck is a hyper-partisan anti-Bush official anyway. I suspect that in other circles the term might be "advocate of the constitution" or "economist." On Dec 8, 2007 9:59 AM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Riiight, nice spin there. Here is a little spin about the report back at > you, from the Wall Street Journal editorial page: > > "Our own 'confidence' is not heightened by the fact that the NIE's main > authors include three former State Department officials with previous > reputations as 'hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials.' > > > On Dec 8, 2007 6:17 AM, Dana wrote: > > > figures ;) > > > > tho I thought the revelation that you had been lied to yet again might > > have > > done the trick.... > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:247962 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
