> Most likely I'm not the only one who thinks that embedding an rfid > chip onto dangerous animal like tiger would be a way to keep it from > harming people. Or it it not working (as the case for SF zoo tiger > incident)?
How? all it would do is provide a means of tracking the animal from a few feet away. Myself given a rampaging tiger I can think of a lot of placed I'd want to be rather than with a scanner trying to detect the animal from 4 to 10 feet away. If you want something science fictional look up preventing aggression via implanting electrodes in the brain - like stimulating the reward system or areas of the hippocampus and hypothalmus. Perhaps that's the route that should be used. larry ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249125 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
