i get the everything. i get it. but come on.
parading around the streets of what appears to be security by swiss cheese and a bunch of freakin lunatics, i mean, it was like she had a freakin sign that said, here are my days left, who is gonna get me first... i dont know... muqtada al sadr is alive, he was smart, and is silently building up a nice little ayatollahood and isnt getting killed... is going to be quite powerful and i know he and her are not related but whatever, its the point of power. anyway, i gotta go finish moving. we are renting a 1920-ish house in the oldest nice district in salisbury :) cant wait for city water, city services, whatever, its a killer house with character, i love it. ill have pictures soon :) later On Dec 27, 2007 12:53 PM, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quite the opposite. His murder allowed the left to drive more and more > concessions to 'peace' which made Israel look weak and spurred on more > terrorism, not less. Rabin was trying to get peace from a position of > strength. The current government is trying to get peace from a position of > bribery. > We'll give you all of Gaza, evict every Jew from it, give you control over > the crossings and all we want is peace. Result? Rocket attacks every day. > His death also allowed the far left (peace now, etc.) to demonize anyone on > the right or anyone religious, causing more strife between Israel's > population. > > But lets not go off into another Israel tangent when the thread is about > Bhutto. If we're going off into a tangent, lets spawn a new thread. > > > > On Dec 27, 2007 12:39 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I may be showing my ignorance of history here, but it seems like the > > murder > > of Israeli Prime MInister Yitzhak (sp?) Rabin seemed to put a real damper > > on > > the growing movement towards reconciliation between the Pals and the > > Israelis. > > > > When a movement is based on peace, sometimes the violent assassination of > > the group's leader can cause the movement to head in the opposite > > direction...with violent reprisals, etc. > > > > On Dec 27, 2007 11:31 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Actually, come to think of it, I don't think there has been a single > > > instance in history where a cause wasn't strengthened in its resolve > > when > > > its leader was martyred. Both good causes and bad (depending on your > > > point > > > of view), it always seems to make a movement stronger. > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > Adam Phillip Churvis > > > President > > > Productivity Enhancement > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:59 AM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: bhutto > > > > > > > > But what if your cause suffers greatly in the event of your death? At > > > > that > > > > point, wouldn't self preservation also serve your cause? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249217 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
