If you're referring to the minority government in Canada, then if I were you I'd stop smoking whatever you're ingesting its obviously affecting whatever neurons you have left. That election was entirely about the corruption of the Chretien government. The minority Conservative government is at 30% according to a CTV Poll (http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071219/decima_poll_071219/20071219/) while the opposition Liberals are at 32%. And it looks like its going to be worse for the conservatives in any upcoming election. Hell even the far left parties, the NDP and the Greens, together are almost as popular as the tories. Anyhow if you really look at the platforms etc., the Conservative Party of Canada has more in common with the Democratic Party than the Republicans. Remember the countries you cited, Britain, France and Canada are considerably to the left of the US.
To tell us another piece of bs. >Did you notice the countries that hated us the most voted for leaders >that support Bush? >France, Germany, Britain and Canada? > >Here are two good articles to read: > >http://americanthinker.com/2008/01/the_conservative_tide_in_major.html >"Since 2004, elections have dramatically [changed] the configuration >in the major democracies and since those transformational elections >public opinion in Germany, Canada, France and Britain show that >pro-American conservative leaders are very popular." > >http://americanthinker.com/2007/01/europes_antiamerican_blinders.html >The fundamental role of anti-Americanism in Europe in general, and >particularly among those on the Left, is to absolve themselves of >their own moral failings and intellectual errors by heaping them onto >the monster scapegoat, the United States of America. For stupidity and >bloodshed to vanish from Europe, the U.S. must be identified as the >singular threat to democracy (contrary to every lesson of actual >history). Thus, during the Cold War, it was dogma among Europeans from >Sweden to Sicily, from Athens to Paris, that the "imperialistic" power >was America, even though it was the USSR that annexed Eastern Europe, >made satellites out of several African countries, and invaded >Afghanistan, even though it was the People's Republic of China that >marched into Tibet, attacked South Korea, and subjugated three >Indochinese countries. A similar dynamic applies today in the war on >terror. > >> So, yes, a young leader who's skin color and international origins >> would set history, and who can inspire via some of the most powerful >> speeches of any current World leader is EXACTLY what we need and it is >> my top issues. > >You want him because of his skin color? That's shallow. >Powerful speech? I thought it was weak. A 26 year old wrote it. I'm >sure he'll be available after Obama loses. > >> Obama simply has no peer when it comes to a candidate that could unite >> not just US citizens with each other, but the US with the World. > >You mean no experience. He's blowing smoke up your ass and you like it too >much. >Tell me what he'll do to change the world besides be black and give >international speeches. > >> We need it to be morning in America again. Remember that? > >Do you mean mourning like the Clinton years? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:250421 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
