On Feb 13, 2008 10:59 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off I hate the way you use liberal.
>
> Thomas Jefferson was a "liberal".  The terms liberal and conservative
> are bandied around so much that they have essentially lost all meaning.

Use the current meaning not the one from 200 years ago.
My use of the word is to attack any little thing about the right while
ignoring everything that's wrong with the left.


>   You're a big government compassionate conservative, they are big
> government social liberals, you both suck.  You both want to spend money
> we don't have, overstep the governments constitutional limits, and
> impose your will on sovereign individuals.  The only difference is your
> motivation for doing so.

I don't support big government.
I do think we need to spend on the military and to fix things like SS
even if we don't have the money.
Just because I don't agree with your interpretation of the
constitution doesn't mean I don't support it.
I have no idea what you're referring to here: impose your will on
sovereign individuals.

> It's not liberal to not want religion in or schools and other government
> and public establishments, it's constitutional.

I agree. I'm asking why he thinks a volunteer has no connection with a
candidate unless they practice religion. Then suddenly the candidate
is a religious zealot by mere association.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254250
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to