As for Obama being honest etc., it would appear that aside from his plagerism 
he's also been caught prevaricating. http://tinyurl.com/269lxh (Article to 
follow). But saying in public one thing and the exact opposite in private is 
not what I would term honest. Then a senior aide claiming that his public 
statements were merely for public consumption only. To me that is sleazy.


Two Canadian Diplomats, One Evasion by Obama

Tuesday, March 4, 2008; A09

For the past four days, Sen. Barack Obama and his campaign staff members have 
been strenuously denying a story first aired by Canadian television on Feb. 27. 
The story has gone through several versions. In its original form, CTV said 
that a "top staffer" from the Obama campaign had telephoned the Canadian 
ambassador to warn him that the candidate would soon be speaking out against 
the North American Free Trade Agreement, the 1993 pact between the United 
States, Canada and Mexico. The staff member allegedly told the ambassador that 
"the criticisms would only be campaign rhetoric and should not be taken at face 
value."

The Canadian Embassy in Washington flatly denied the story, and Obama repeated 
the embassy's denials. It now turns out that, while there were errors in the 
original CTV story, a senior Obama campaign staffer did talk about NAFTA with a 
senior Canadian diplomat.
THE FACTS

Courtesy of Nedra Pickler of the Associated Press, we now have a 
contemporaneous account of what took place at the Feb. 8 meeting between a 
senior Obama campaign official, Austan Goolsbee, and the Canadian consul 
general in Chicago, Georges Rioux. The AP obtained a 1,300-word memo describing 
the meeting that was written by a Canadian consulate official, Joseph DeMora.

In an interview with the AP, Goolsbee contested a portion of the memo that 
quotes him as saying that campaign rhetoric "that may be perceived to be 
protectionist is more reflective of political maneuvering than policy." He 
acknowledged telling the Canadians that Obama's position on NAFTA "is less 
about fundamentally changing the agreement and more in favor of 
strengthening/clarifying language on labor mobility and environment and trying 
to establish these as more 'core' principles of the agreement."

DeMora's memo is more nuanced and subtle than the initial CTV report. Both the 
Canadian Embassy and the Obama campaign seized on the inaccuracies in the 
report to try to knock down the story. This is a classic news-management 
technique known as "parsing": Focus on a detail that you can safely say is 
untrue, aggressively deny it, and create the impression that the entire story 
is inaccurate.

In this case, the detail about the Obama staff member telephoning the Canadian 
ambassador in Washington was inaccurate. There was no contact between the 
embassy and the Obama campaign on NAFTA. But the denials omitted an important 
part of the story: An Obama campaign staff member had discussed NAFTA with a 
senior Canadian diplomat. While a consulate general is a different entity from 
an embassy, they are both staffed by Canadian diplomats.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton insisted yesterday that the campaign had not misled 
reporters. He said that Goolsbee, who serves as Obama's senior economic 
adviser, had gone to the Canadian consulate in Chicago for an "informal" 
meeting, rather than as an authorized emissary of the campaign. He said that 
there was "nothing inconsistent" between what Goolsbee told the Canadians 
privately and Obama's promises on the campaign trail to renegotiate the NAFTA 
agreement.
THE PINOCCHIO TEST

The bottom line is that it has taken four days to drag something approaching 
the full story out of the Canadian Embassy and the Obama campaign. As I 
suggested before, both Obama and his opponent, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, 
have exaggerated their opposition to NAFTA in order to win votes in 
economically depressed Ohio. This is a case where the technical parsing of the 
truth by the Obama campaign falls well short of the whole truth.

Two Pinocchios.

ONE PINOCCHIO: Some shading of the facts. TWO PINOCCHIOS: Significant omissions 
or exaggerations. THREE PINOCCHIOS: Significant factual errors. FOUR 
PINOCCHIOS: Real whoppers. THE GEPPETTO CHECK MARK: Statements and claims 
contain the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

> I still feel very iffy about him. The last president with so little 
> experience was the Shrub, and look where it got us.
> 
> >I don't think there is any real mystery here. He's a decent, 
> honorable guy
> >in a dirty profession and people like that. I'd say I like him almost 
> as
> >much as I like McCain. I'm still voting for McCain, though.
> >
> >On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Gruss G wrote:
> >
> >> Republicans like Sen. Barack Obama nearly as much as they like 
> their
> >> own likely presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain, according to a 
> new
> >> Fox 5/The Washington Times/Rasmussen Reports poll.
> >> 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:255599
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to