The for loop in CF 4.x was much slower. CF 5's version of it is almost as fast as a CFLOOP. I've tested it but have to look up where I have the stats. Probably in a FA article.
At 02:20 PM 3/26/02, you wrote: >Any one know if this performs better in cf5? Would it be sufficient to test >just by wrapping the 2 different methods in gettickcount? > >Thanks > >Kola > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >Sent: 26 March 2002 12:08 >> >To: CF-Community >> >Subject: Looping through a recordset with CFSCRIPT Continued >> > >> > >> >>From an earlier question on CF-Talk ..... >> > >> >Someone wanted to loop through a recordset within a CFSCRIPT >> >block, so from >> >our esteemed listmaster's docs >> >(http://www.houseoffusion.com/docs/cfscript.htm) we have this >> >example (great >> >stuff by the way): >> > >> ><CFSCRIPT> >> > For (i=1;i LTE Queryname.Recordcount; i=i+1) >> > writeoutput(Queryname.Record[i]&'<BR>'); >> ></CFSCRIPT> >> > >> >In regular CF: >> > >> ><cfloop query="queryName"> >> > <cfoutput>#Record#<br></cfoutput> >> ></cfloop> >> > >> >Which is better? Should I use CFSCRIPT for looping through and displaying >> >complicated data tables or continue with regular CFOUTPUT? >> > >> > >> >Erika >> >(with a *K*) >> > >> >"Life... is like a grapefruit. It's orange and squishy, >> >and has a few pips in it, and some folks have half a one for breakfast." >> >----------------------------------------------------- >> >Erika L. Walker-Arnold, VP, RUWebby, LLC >> >----------------------------------------------------- >> >Macromedia ColdFusion Alliance Partner >> >Macromedia ColdFusion 5.0 Certified Developer >> >----------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
