On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So there are no avenues of protest, or getting their message out, than > physically attacking Olympic athletes carrying a torch? Maybe they feel that there are no other avenues that get world interest. Maybe they know that the media will just ignore a simple protest against China while they will not ignore an attempt to stop the Olympic torch. Yes, it corrupts the message they're trying to send but maybe they feel its the only way to get the message recognized. Never condoned it, don't even like it, but just trying to understand it. > Not OK. Not even a little bit OK. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. For whatever > reason. So your saying violence to get a message out or protest something is wrong whatever the reason, correct? Just making sure I have your quote right if ever I need it later. :) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:258122 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
