hi robert, i'm gonna save this email you sent. i'll email you after the nov. election. i appreciate your perception of the world vis a vis "what's gonna happen" - the simple truth is you don't know.
none of us does. further, your perception seems based on a particular set of assumptions as to why Obama is incapable of winning in relation to the points you address. duly noted. further, unless you're talking about issues far more vital to my grandchildren, it seems your email is more consistent with opinion/tv commentary (which is not journalism), which gauges it's impact based on riling up the masses about "old school" concerns rather than frank and clear information sharing. good luck with that. it seems a tired pony that is losing its luster. the millenium generation is unconcerned about many of the "hot button" issues of baby boomers and older generations, and yet emails such as yours indicate some folks think there's more race in that pony before it goes to the glue factory - just like the "world is flat," and the "earth is the center of the universe," and that one can only know people that the most fearful of us will accept. lol. ok. perceptual evolution... it's a process. thanks for sharing your opinion. we all have one and i'm sure yours is important to you. i am fond of mine too. i do look forward to seeing your emails up to and after nov. when the election results come in. in the interim, please do continue to share your "issues", perceived or real. it reveals much about your style of thinking and engagement on subjects that concern you. you're either a brilliant prognosticator, or your thinking is representative of what USA has yet to overcome in it's pursuit of ongoing excellence. time will tell. and you'll probably continue to share your opinion. i for one look forward to reading it. btw, what political party registration do you have? I've been unaffiliated to any political party all my life. cheers, jason unaffiliated voter. ps - keating 5, anti-catholic sentiments, wmd's and the people who "convinced" w... so many idiots close to every one of these politicians. you're distinctions about obama seem arbitrary and based on a willingness to overlook all the data. always a bad proposition. On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do I judge a person who wants to hold the most powerful elected office on > the planet by the company they keep? Of course I do, and so should you. > More > importantly, the voting public is going to judge him on these > associations, > make no mistake. That's why the story has not gone away. > > The problem is not just the company Obama keeps, it is his total failure > to > explain in plain terms why he keeps the company he does. Wright is a > raving > racist who spouts lunatic conspiracy theories like the idea that HIV was > introduced by the US government in an attempted genocide against people of > color. Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist who advocated the violent > overthrow > of the US government. Rezko is a garden-variety criminal - that's almost > tame by comparison. > > Let's understand why Americans are going to judge Obama by his association > with Wright and Ayers in particular. Wright talks the kind of divisive, > racist trash that Obama says he wants to overcome. Ayers advocated > overthrowing the Constitution that Obama, as a US Senator, is sworn to > protect, and would be sworn to protect as Commander in Chief. It bothers > people that Obama would freely associate with someone who took such a > radcal > view and has never renounced his actions. > > What we have, then, is a politician saying one thing and doing another- > saying he wants to rise above divisive politics and defend the > Constitution > as President, while he associates with a horribly divisive, racist > preacher > and an anti-US terrorist. Politicians do this stuff all the time, but the > entire premise of Obama's campaign was that he was going to be different. > So > much for being different. That is why these stories have legs and why > Obama > has fallen back to earth, especially among working class whites, who are > basically hard-working, patriotic people who love the United States. This > kind of stuff makes them leery of the guy, and the polls show it. > > Loathe though I am to admit it, Hillary Clinton is right. Barring a major > change in rhetoric coming from his campaign, Obama now has no chance in > the > general election. The problem for Hillary, though, is that she really > doesn't have a chance, either. He loses Reagan Democrats, she loses > independents and probably a big chunk of African-Americans who may not > vote > if she engineers a win for the nomination. > > The Democratic Party is in the process of completely self-destructing, > it's > almost surreal. > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:54 PM, denstar wrote: > > > Real issues is cool, but are you seriously saying you judge someone by > > the company they keep? > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:259160 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
