I'm not saying he doesn't suck, I'm saying that there are fewer sources of news than you think. It has nothing to do with advertisers or people being reached. It has to do with sources. And again, in America it only looks like there are thousands of media sources. Maybe on the very local level but once you get past your town, city or state, you're looking at one of the mainstream, mass media outlets. As for Bush, I'd rather have him suck on his own merit rather than having extra suck-age added by creative editing.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dino wrote: > > If you dig down you'll find that there really aren't that many media > > sources. > > Tell that to an advertiser. There are 1000s. And no, I'm not judging > media by "influence" I'm judging them the way advertisers do: number > of people reached. > > The argument present by Cam, from what I can tell, is that Bush really > doesn't suck; it's just that 80% of Americans think he does because > they're hyp-no-tized by "the mainstream media". > > I'm pointing out that that's factually false. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:262525 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
