The following from a pro-palestinian site, even doesnt' create a great case
that the palestinians were all slaughtered and forced out of their homes in
1948.  It even says the palestinians left because of the depth of their own
haterd and because of the "intermixing of the population".   Sounds like a
neo-nazi sentiment to me.
<begin quoted material from
http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Palestine-Remembered/Story562.html >

Why Palestinians Left Their Homes?

Why 700,000 people became refugees was subsequently hotly disputed between
Israel and its supporters and the Arabs and theirs. Israeli
spokesmen--including "official" historians and writers of textbooks--
maintained that Arabs had fled "voluntarily," or because the Arab states'
leaders had urged or ordered them to leave [click here to read our response
to this claim], to clear the ground for the invasion of May 15, and enable
their spokesman to claim that they had been systematically and with
premeditation expelled the refugees. Documentation that surfaced in massive
quantities during the 1980s in Israeli and Western achieves has demonstrated
that neither "official" version is accurate or sufficient.
The creation of the [refugees] problem was almost inevitable, given:

  a.. the geographical intermixing of the population
  b.. the history of the Arab-Jewish hostility since 1917
  c.. rejection of both sides of a binominal solution
  d.. the depth of the Arab animosity toward the Jews and fears of coming
under Jewish rule.
The structural weaknesses that characterized Palestinian society on the eve
of the war made it especially susceptible to collapse and flight. It was

  a.. poorly organized, with little social or political cohesion,
  b.. there were deep divisions between rural and urban population, and
  c.. between Muslims and Christians, and
  d.. between various elite clans.
  e.. The absence of representative leaders, and
  f.. national institutions [such as labor unions, health care, defense, tax
collections, ..etc.]
  g.. As a result of economic and social processes that had begun in the
mid-nineteenth century, large parts of the the rural population had been
rendered landless by the 1940s. In consequence there was a constant, growing
shift of population from the countryside to urban shantytowns and slums; to
some degree this led to both physical and psychological divorce from the
land. Moreover, 70 or 80 percent of the people were illiterate [reader
should not that the public educational system available to Palestinians
before 1948 was limited to 25%-30% of total eligible Palestinian student
population]. In some measure this resulted in and was mirrored by a low
level of political consciousness and activism. The "nationalism" of the
urban elite was shared little; if at all, by the urban poor and peasantry.
  h.. And finally, the Arab economy in Palestine had failed to make shift
from primitive, agriculture economy to a reindustrialize one--as the Yishuv
had done. Equally relevant, in towns very few Arab workers were unionized;
none, except the small number in British government service, enjoyed the
benefit of unemployment insurance. Effectively ejected from Jewish
enterprises and farms when Arab factories and offices closed down, they lost
their means of livelihood. For some, exile may have become an attractive
option, at least until Palestine calmed down.

--Beth, Pseudo usenet cop
Merlin MTB, BikeE AT, RANS gliss, Trek R200, Kickbike
Owned by Kavik (Samoyed Boy) and Toklat (Keeshond Boy)
Anchorage, Alaska




______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to