> That vote was in 2002, Obama wasn't in the Senate until 2005. Oops, you are right of course, I was thinking of his speeches and opposition against the war in 2002.
> Obama wanted to quit the war instead of win it. The collateral damage > would have been in vain. There are many of us that believe that we need a president that will take those huge amounts of money that currently are being used to support this war and spend it in better ways (just take a look at the worsening problems here at home...we need a President focused *here* not in Iraq). It's not just a matter of "quitting" or "winning" the war. There are other ways to "win" a war than by brute force. Frankly, this really isn't a war we are ever going to win by any normal definition of the word. Also, I would rather have a president in office that I can trust is not going to lead us down that same path *again* in other places. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:264608 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
