> Iraq had nothing to do with AQ. If you're thinking that if "we attack 
> them there, so they won't attack us", that's been shown to be wrong a 
> long time ago. 

Exactly. And an important point is that if removing Sadam from power was the 
objective (and it was indeed a good goal to have, his crimes against the people 
of Iraq were clear), an all-out war on the country *should* have been a last 
resort. There were a variety of approaches that could have been tried first 
instead (many of which were presented to Bush up to the final hour but went 
ignored) before resorting to war. 




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:264632
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to