You agree to be searched and monitored when you buy a plane ticket. I don't like it, but it's the way it is.
Maureen wrote: > I don't see any way this could stand up to a constitutional challenge. > It's almost as if the person who wrote the ruling was deliberately > flaunting the Fourth Amendment. > > Or perhaps they've just never read it. I like to post it frequently, > in case they're reading my email. > > "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, > papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall > not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, > supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the > place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> When an agent of the government can search, seize, and detain without >> provocation we've gone WAY WAY off track. >> >> And to think that the person responsible for leading us so far astray >> hasn't done so in a zillion other areas and ways is self delusion. >> >> It's going to take the justice dept alone decades to recover. And >> that assumes Obama gets elected. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:265166 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
