> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 9:44 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: McCain's VP want's Creationism taught in Science Class
> 
> I personally think that we can't explain the beginning, that evolution
> theory could very well just be the method that whatever creator used to
> get us to our current state.  You know, know one can know the mind of
> god type deal?  Don't follow any religion, just think something started
> it.

For (the little) that it's worth I see absolutely nothing with this... I
would call it a strong sense of the sacred.

In other words whether you feel "that there must be something" or are simply
in awe of the many unknowns in the universe (like I am) a sense of humility
and respect before the cosmos can't be a bad thing.  This was very much the
God of Einstein: the clock-maker, the rule-maker.

This sense of the sacred more and more common and, I think, completely
compatible with science.  Essentially if one is willing to accept the Bible
as fallible and metaphor and willing to accept the evidence presented by the
universe as proof, rather than rejection, of "God's" intent then it's easy
to resolve the issue. 
 
> When I see the way the planets revolve around the sun, and the way that
> mimics the nucleus and electrons in an atom, it seems to be more than a
> coincidence.  The veins in a leaf, things like that.

Well... electrons don't move anything like the planets.  ;^)

The orbital model of the atom was (and is) incredibly useful and simple to
understand but it just didn't stand up to continued study.

This is a great example tho' of science and education.  The orbital model IS
incredibly useful to teaching the basic concepts of the atom: so it's still
found in many middle- and high-school textbooks.  The theory is _wrong_ but
the model is illuminating!

The actual behavior of electrons was (and is) still being investigated to
explain quantum effects and observed behaviors.  There is actual scientific
controversy here - but for the most part it's not part of high-school
curricula.  The truth of the matter is vastly interesting, but doesn't
really add all that much to the main thrust of high-school education:
primarily to introduce major topics and understand the mechanisms of the
discipline.

This is, for me, the main reason I rail so heavily against ID.  They ignore
scientific discipline in the creation of their ideas, ignore scientific
inquiry in the promotion of them and ignore scientific standards in the
demand that they be respected.  They've flown in the face of science, shat
over all of its principles and goals and yet still demand respect and
equality from it.

If we've got time in the curriculum then there are ACTUAL controversies in
science that could be added.  There's more information in the little that we
do know than could ever be taught in a million years of high-school and
these people want to waste precious time on a selfish, disrespectful
invention.

> I don't think I'm a cultist.

Of course not.  Just as my being an atheist doesn't make me immune to
wonder.

This is actually one of the biggest problems we have.  I still believe that
the beliefs of many evangelicals simply cannot be rectified with the way
science works - with these people I don't believe that we can EVER come to a
compromise.

However the problem is deeper than that.  There's a fundamental
misunderstanding of PEOPLE here.  Some humanists are absolutely convinced
that these people are unable to reason.  That they are, fundamentally,
unintelligent.

This is, of course, wrong (and something I have sometimes been guilty of).

For their part some of these people are absolutely convinced that a lack of
religion results in a lack of morals.  That people who don't believe in God
are, for lack of a better word, evil.

This is also wrong.

While I do think that the ideological questions cannot ultimately be
compromised on the vitriol of the debate, I think, comes from this
misconception that the PEOPLE involved are fundamentally different from each
other.

Jim Davis




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:267664
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to