On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Sam, you really do have the worst reading comprehension of any adult I've > > met. > > Have you met many? >
A great deal of them. I suppose that I may have erred in my assumption that you are an adult of course. My apologies if my assumption was unwarranted. > > > I explained that my belief was based on her statement that she "reads > > what is put in front of her", > > "any of them that have been in front of me over all these years." > > Your comprehension was that handlers made all things appear in front > of her? Maybe the GOPAC still follows her around? > Indeed. There are plenty of GOPAC people involved in the campaign. I'd happily bet money that she is being followed around by GOPAC people and that they are the ones putting material in front of her. Most of it currently would be debate prep material one would presume. > > > her history as a GOPAC alumnus, knowledge of > > how GOPAC does its trainings and her inability/unwillingness to talk > about > > which news sources she does follow. The combination of those things does > a > > reasonable job of explaining why she would say she "reads them all". If > you > > have a better explanation for the statement, I'd be glad to hear it. > > If Obama said I read them all and didn't tick of names nobody would > know. Since it's Palin there's a conspiracy. I can't believe you don't > see it. Try to look from both sides, please, at least once. > Ah, so you want me to believe that Obama would not have been called out if he had given the same answer she did and that there is a conspiracy against Palin. That counts as the other side? I'll try to consider the conspiracy angle first next time, I promise. > > > And I never did claim to not form my opinions from pre-filtered data. > Once > > again, poor reading comprehension. But now I'll happily admit to it if > you > > like. > > > Ahhh, so the rant about dailyKos could have been a reference to you, > stupid me to think you could not support something but still partake. > The inclusion of DailyKos was an attempt to how someone on the left wing could end up in much the same position as the one I think Palin finds herself in now. Replace GOPAC with DFA Nightschool, for instance, and you could easily end up with someone on the left who is brought up as a well handled true believer that is politically talented and intelligent but has little or no serious exposure to conflicting view points. And yes, that was stupid of you. Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:272008 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
