On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "John McCain was reprimanded by the bipartisan Senate Ethics Committee,"
> Was he, or was he not reprimanded?

"Reprimanded" does not appear to be a word used in this context.  Unless you
have a bone to pick...

From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

The Ethics Committee ruled that the involvement of McCain in the scheme was
also minimal, and he too was cleared of all charges against
him.[45]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five#cite_note-Salinger-44>
[44] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five#cite_note-PBS-43> McCain was
criticized by the Committee for exercising "poor judgment" when he met with
the federal regulators on Keating's
behalf.[8]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five#cite_note-az-keating-7>The
report also said that McCain's "actions were not improper nor attended
with gross negligence and did not reach the level of requiring institutional
action against him....Senator McCain has violated no law of the United
States or specific Rule of the United States
Senate."[48]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five#cite_note-nyt-sen-eth-47>On
his Keating Five experience, McCain has said: "The appearance of it
was
wrong. It's a wrong appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting
with a group of regulators, because it conveys the impression of undue and
improper influence. And it was the wrong thing to
do."[8]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five#cite_note-az-keating-7>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:272615
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to