On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They didn't find any information, but the hack itself made news for days and > the coverage was generally extremely abusive of Sarah Palin, regardless of > the fact that there was no dirt in her email account. Ah, the media.
She discussed using private email accounts as a possible way to get around record keeping requirements and subpoena law. Then one or more private accounts comes to light. The media are supposed to just ignore that? >> And you yourself linked to the story in an honest-to-god newspaper >> that used freedom of information act requests to track down >> information and put pressure on agencies to investigate. How the hell >> is that ignoring it? Aren't they, you know, investigating? > > > Let's see if Obama's media spokespeople at the NYTimes, NBC, MSNBC pick up > the story. Ah, so when you say "the media" you mean that ones you don't like. Gotcha. Well, I'd guess that since the original report is only a couple hours old and its a Friday night, we'll probably have to wait for early next week to see. Hopefully by then they will have figured out who accessed what and then we can judge the media outlets you named for publishing or not publishing things. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:276485 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
