How is the blame more on the republican side? Is it not the deomcrats who oppose drilling in ANWAR and off-shore?
As for 'tree hugger', I use that as frequently as I do 'bible-thumper' and I loathe both groups equally. If it offends, I apologize. On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >'the oil companies own about 5 times the potential reserves in domestic > >exploration leases in the mainland of the US' I think you may have missed > a > >word or 2 in there as I can't seem to make sense of it. > > > The current domestic exploration leases on government lands have a far > greater potential than ANWAR. If you remember last July there was a bill > requiring oil companies to "use it or lose it" in terms of their current oil > exploration leases on government lands in the continental US. personally I > think that these leases that the companies are just sitting on and not doing > anything else should be fully exploited before any very risky arctic oil > drilling take place. > > > > >What is the propaganda, the label of 'tree huggers' or that they are being > >blamed for blocking the drilling? > > all of the above. 'tree huggers'is a perjorative. And the blame is more on > the republican side. Ergo propaganda > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:277265 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
