I find all of that interesting as well. The Bush ties to big oil and the Saudis are fairly well documented from what I have seen, and I doubt there is an educated adult in the country who doesn't automatically associate Cheney with Big Bad Oil.
As for Cubans, Castro is the Cuban terrorist-in-chief. Once again, you miss the point. It isn't a scandal, but it is news. How people judge the news is up to them. I take it from your comments that you feared, like the liberal establishment might have feared, that Americans were so ignorant and racist that they would never elect a guy with "Arab ties". I disagree, I think it would have made no different in the election, but that's irrelevant. It is the duty of the press to report and let the viewers decide what they think, not to decide what the viewers should know. That sounds more like Russia than the United States. In Russia, at least journalists have the excuse that they'll get killed if they go against the Kremlin. What is the excuse of the press in this country if they go against the liberal establishment? There is no excuse, because by and large they ARE the liberal establishment. On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Maureen wrote: > > I find fault with their sins too, but for me I'm much more curious > about why they didn't investigate Cheney's ties to Big Oil, or the > Bush family connects to the Saudi Royals. Or McCain's association > with Cuban terrorists. But none of that holds a candle to the > important of Obama's Bedouin cousin - what a scandal. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280183 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
