I still don't get it. Radio make money because you have to buy a spot on the radio to make your broadcast. TV makes money every time you buy a spot. So a website can't make money? Huh?
You still make no sense. YouTube is going to have a much bigger audience than the white house website, doesn't matter what kind of campaign you throw at it. As far as authenticity. That's easily covered by disclaimers and educating the public to know that unless it was posted by the OFFICIAL Obama youtube member account, question it's contents. Blah blah blah. That aside ... fakes will exist in all forms everywhere. Not going to matter where they are posted. Coming up with this as an excuse to not post on youtube is ridiculous. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly. > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I'd think that Google, owning YouTube, would stand to make a fortune off > > of the advertising. (IMO) The president(elect) would be better served, by > > posting streaming video to the White House.gov site. > > > > Erika L. Walker wrote: > >> It's got nothing to do with Google. What does Google have to do with > Obama > >> using Social Networking to his advantage? > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280559 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
