At a minimum, doesn't the constitution make it clear it's a federal issue? I still don't see how you feel it isn't an individual right, I know you're well read, I know you know history.
Oh, and you can buy both tanks and bazookas. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:36 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense > > > gMoney wrote: > > I kept looking through all that, waiting to find this "nonsense" of > > which you speak...but all I kept finding was "sense". > > > > I was thinking the same thing. > > And I'm never sure where these gun discussions go because > they lack a foundation in logic. > > We already ban guns. You can't own bazookas. You can't > legally buy a tank. > > So we already "constrain" the right (assuming you think > believe the Constitution confers an individual right which I don't) > > Therefore it seems like the discussion comes down to: > > 1.) Degree of constraint, and > 2.) Who legislates it. > > Personally I agree with constraint and I'm all for giving the > powers of constraint to local governments. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280654 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
