I could certainly see the evolutionary benefit in ending procreation in defective gene lines, as part of natural selection (and no, before anyone even asks, I'm not implying that homosexuality is in any way genetically defective)
Michael Grant [Modus I.S.] wrote: > "That there very well may have been evolutionary benefits to homosexuality" > > Explain the benefits to not being able to continue a species? > > > -----Original message----- > From: Ian Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:56:04 -0500 > To: cf-community [email protected] > Subject: Re: the list > > >> Michael Grant wrote: >> >>> ... >>> >> Pinhead. >> >> I'll let others with more time to point out some of the many short >> comings in your arguments. That there very well may have been >> evolutionary benefits to homosexuality. That there are more ways to be >> productive to society then having children. Etc. >> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280747 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
