Oooo contrair mon frair! Christian moral != "Constitutionally moral" (I just made constitutional morality up)
Sometimes it can (which you mentioned) but when it don't, it ain't constitutional (my point). Putting religion above the rest (is "religious" a religion?) just ain't cool, and I'm pretty sure that's written on that old piece of hemp somewhere. Assuming the Constitution was written on hemp (which I may be making up). Again, it's pretty clear that laws cannot be based on purely -- let's say, for instance -- Zionist morals. That would be like establishing a religion, wouldn't it? Sorta, kinda? Do you think we should require, say, a Bible, to explain why we have X law? Or do you think it should be explainable even without the "religious" framework? Morals and Ethics and Science-- oh my! Really... oh my! What a conundrum, we still find ourselves in, hundreds if not thousands of years later... -- Well begun is half done. Aristotle On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > Your opinion is not supported anywhere in the Constitution. > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:06 PM, denstar wrote: > >> >> In other words, I think it's pretty clear that decisions cannot be >> based on religious morals (/which/ religion?, as G sorta mentions). >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:282038 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
