> JJ wrote:
> You just argued 2 sides of the same argument.
>
> Which was it? He didn't use deadly force, or he tried to murder them?
>

My point was that the use of the gun was not justified even ignoring
any issues about who's property was who's.  The gun owner had no
reason to have it out and he could've simply walked away; instead he's
clearly provoking the crowd.

So, ignoring all other issues, the gun toter is in the wrong.

Then you add in the fact that he was trespassing and it makes him all the worse.

As to your response, it's your choice if you want to excuse someone
for murdering your family while illegally trespassing on your
property.  Luckily the law doesn't agree with you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:282271
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to