> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 1:37 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: SCIENCE!
> 
> This goes back to one of my sticking points with the entire "Global
> Warming doesn't exist crowd."
> 
> 1) We know that dumping chemicals into rivers and stream is bad, why?
> it
> kills fish. While we are not fish, we need many of the same things that
> fish need to survive.
> 2)  We know that dumping chemicals into the air is bad, why? because it
> kills birds and trees, While we are neither we need many of the same
> things...
> etc.etc,

Actually I would take exception to that line of argument as well - but for a
different reason.  The "Global Warming" debate is about just that: global
warming or, more generally, climate change.

There are several issues that often get snowballed into it that aren't truly
related.  A few of the most common are pollution, ozone depletion and
resource management.  Although these are often lumped together under the
umbrella of "being green" they are all very different things and I think
it's dangerous to lump them together.

CO2 is not a "poisonous" gas (in and of itself) - although in some cases it
could be a predicate for individual disasters (some algae blooms and the
like may be partially blamed on unusual CO2 concentrations).  We could, in
theory, address Global Warming (specifically CO2 emissions) without
addressing any pollution or reusable energy concerns (for example if we
sequestered just CO2 in order to become "Carbon Neutral" but maintained all
other practices as we are).  By the same token we could address pollution
concerns (stop or filter dumping) without ever addressing other concerns and
so forth.

So, in short, arguing (as I think you are) that we should worry about Global
warming and presenting clearly pollution-related reasons just isn't
convincing.  Although the causes are often the same (burning "dirty" fuels)
the two problems really are separate.  I just think it leaves open an
unnecessary vector for attack: namely that "greens" and "liberals" are just
anti-industry and don't really know why.

Now, as I've said (over and over) many of the solutions being proposed
naturally address multiple points of concern (and, I think, this might be
your underlying point).  Renewable power
(Solar/Wind/Geothermal/Hydroelectric/Ocean Current/Etc) has issues, but does
address Global Warming, pollution, resource management and, in some cases,
Ozone depletion.  The various "scrubbers" and sequestration techniques being
proposed will also capture pollutants.  "Zero footprint" tree farms and
lumber practices address several points as well.

My biggest complaint levied against the anti-Global warming crowd is the
absolutely moronic opinion that because there's a question as to degree
nothing should be done.  In other words because we don't know how much of an
effect we might have we should do nothing until we're "sure".  Don't get me
wrong tho': this is just as stupid as those that believe that the current
evidence warrants drastic, civilization changing measures to prevent global
disaster.

Either position is ridiculous on the face of it simply because of that
underlying point: investing in those solutions that address multiple
concerns is clearly a path to compromise and effectiveness.  At this point
we might all agree that technologies that cut pollution, reduce resource
usage and preserve habitat are "good"... and the simple fact is that most of
them also address the concerns being raised about climate change.  Not to
mention that most also reduce our dependence upon foreign resources and
increase our potential economic footprint.

Jim Davis


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283209
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to