I honestly don't care what the guy was busted for. If the search was based on anything illegal or bogus then evidence is excluded. Period. I don't care what the crime is. Does it mean that some guilty people will get off on a technicality? Yes it does. And I'm ok with that. I fear a police state far more than I fear a guy with meth in his car.
Judah On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Jerry Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Crap like the guy driving around with meth? I agree. > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/01/us-high-court-o.html >> >> Cop pulls a guy over, central says to cop "hey guy has an outstanding >> warrant". Cop searches the car based on that and finds a small >> quantity of meth. Dispatcher calls cop back and says, "sorry, that >> warrant was vacated, nothing outstanding, the db was just not up to >> date". Evidence is still permitted by the court because the cop didn't >> intend to do something wrong. >> >> So, think we'll be seeing a new spate of "computer errors"? Crap like >> that makes my blood boil. >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:285056 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
