Next Sentence:

" A few of Obama's closest aides were there, along with a White House
photographer."

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Polsky [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:45 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: O Re-Oaths

The article mentions : *"No TV camera crews or news photographers were
allowed in. "*  - then HOW do we know if it actually happened.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote:

> WASHINGTON - After the flub heard around the world, President Barack
> Obama has taken the oath of office. Again. Chief Justice John Roberts
> delivered the oath to Obama on Wednesday night at the White House _ a
> rare do-over. The surprise moment came in response to Tuesday's
> much-noticed stumble, when Roberts got the words of the oath a little
> off, which prompted Obama to do so, too.
>
> Don't worry, the White House says: Obama has still been president
> since noon on Inauguration Day.
>
> Nevertheless, Obama and Roberts went through the drill again out of
> what White House counsel Greg Craig called "an abundance of caution."
>
> This time, the scene was the White House Map Room in front of a small
> group of reporters, not the Capitol platform before the whole watching
> world.
>
> "We decided that because it was so much fun ...," Obama joked to
> reporters who followed press secretary Robert Gibbs into the room. No
> TV camera crews or news photographers were allowed in. A few of
> Obama's closest aides were there, along with a White House
> photographer.
>
> "We decided that because it was so much fun ...," Obama joked to
> reporters who followed press secretary Robert Gibbs into the room. No
> TV camera crews or news photographers were allowed in. A few of
> Obama's closest aides were there, along with a White House
> photographer.
>
> "Are you ready to take the oath?" he said.
>
> "Yes, I am," Obama said. "And we're going to do it very slowly."
>
> Roberts then led Obama through the oath without any missteps.
>
> The president said he did not have his Bible with him, but that the
> oath was binding anyway.
>
> The original, bungled version on Tuesday caught observers by surprise
> and then got replayed on cable news shows.
>
> It happened when Obama interrupted Roberts midway through the opening
> line, in which the president repeats his name and solemnly swears.
>
> Next in the oath is the phrase " ... that I will faithfully execute
> the office of president of the United States." But Roberts rearranged
> the order of the words, not saying "faithfully" until after "president
> of the United States."
>
> That appeared to throw Obama off. He stopped abruptly at the word
> "execute."
>
> Recognizing something was off, Roberts then repeated the phrase,
> putting "faithfully" in the right place but without repeating
> "execute."
>
> But Obama then repeated Roberts' original, incorrect version: "... the
> office of president of the United States faithfully."
>
> Craig, the White House lawyer, said in a statement Wednesday evening:
> "We believe the oath of office was administered effectively and that
> the president was sworn in appropriately yesterday. Yet the oath
> appears in the Constitution itself. And out of the abundance of
> caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice
> John Roberts will administer the oath a second time."
>
> The Constitution is clear about the exact wording of the oath and as a
> result, some constitutional experts have said that a do-over probably
> wasn't necessary but also couldn't hurt. Two other previous presidents
> have repeated the oath because of similar issues, Calvin Coolidge and
> Chester A. Arthur.
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:286102
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to