> Scott wrote: > > Oh, so because its 'better than it was' its OK for Obama to go back on his > word? >
Holding someone to their word when doing so is to both of your detriments is ridiculous. Is that the case here? I don't know and neither do you. Obama says it is. You obviously won't trust him on that and, for now, I will. So there we are. But I suggest if you want to stand on a principle, at least stand on a practical data-driven one: "he promised not too, but he is when he doesn't need to and here's why ..." You point is kind of like saying that since NASA promised Apollo 13 astronauts would return in the command module instead of the lunar module they shouldn't have returned. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:287185 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
