There's a lot of truth in this......a lot of truth.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>    I have no inside information on the latest election, but I was on
> the ground for the 2005 rounds of elections in Fallujah, and can shed
> some light and historical perspective on what happened.  As your
> sources noted, the Sunnis of Anbar province boycotted the first round
> of elections in January, 2005.  Out of a city with an approximate
> population of 180,000, Fallujah saw 8,000 turn out to vote.  What was
> never revealed, maybe until now, is that those numbers were
> significantly padded by the 4,300 Iraqi Army soldiers stationed in
> Fallujah.  And these soldiers were nearly all Shi'a from Baghdad or
> Basra.  So, in the end, less than 4,000 Fallujans actually voted in
> that first election.
>
>    The job of that first assembly, as you may recall, was to draft a
> constitution, like our Constitutional Convention of 1787.  The Sunnis
> of Al Anbar, and especially Fallujah, realized quickly that their
> boycott had only resulted in ceding all the power to the Shi'a and the
> Kurds.  So they decided to participate in the next round of elections.
> First came the constitutional referendum, which saw more than 100,000
> Fallujans vote (nearly unanimously against it) in October of 2005.
> Then, in December, even more Fallujans, 130,000+ by the Iraqi Election
> Commission's reckoning, voted in the Iraqi National Assembly
> elections.
>
>    Setting the conditions to allow this election was the major
> objective of my unit at the time, and we all did everything we could
> to encourage the large turnout.  But it seemed to me then, and still
> does, that this early emphasis on elections was certain to backfire.
> Our political leaders were selling elections as if they were a magical
> cure for all the problems of Iraq, that, simply by voting, Iraq would
> become like all the other democracies in the world. And this clearly
> was not the case.
>
>    Elections in the absence of stability might have even made things
> worse, offering false hope to the soon-to-be disillusioned Sunnis of
> Al Anbar.  The riots and uptick in violence in Anbar province that
> occurred when the election results were announced (in early 2006)
> would seem to confirm this view.
>
>    Before the election I talked with a lot of Fallujans about what
> the election would mean to them and what they expected from it.  To a
> man they were convinced that Sunnis were the majority population in
> Iraq and once they all voted, Sunnis would take their rightful place
> at the head of government.  It was impossible to counter this idea.
> If I suggested that generally accepted figures by the U.N. placed
> Sunni Arabs at about 20% of all Iraqis they would dismiss it out of
> hand. Who gave you those figures?  The Shi'a?  Iran? I remember the
> old men saying, "How can this be?  Look around you, everyone here is
> Sunni. Everyone I know is Sunni. You Americans are so naïve to believe
> everything the Shi'a tell you."
>
>    During these conversations, I recalled our training on Iraqi
> culture prior to our deployment.  A professor from Georgetown
> University had warned us (mostly college educated officers) how
> different it would be to interact with illiterate people.  Most people
> in Al Anbar could not read, she said, and therefore they had only
> their limited personal experience, and the words of their elders, to
> provide context to their reality.  For a literate person, it is
> virtually impossible to comprehend how an illiterate person processes
> information.  How true this observation turned out to be. The idea
> that our civilian leadership thought liberal democracy would spring up
> naturally in this environment still seems incomprehensibly foolish to
> me.
>
>    I think the folly of introducing "democracy" with the hasty
> election scheme was disastrous and foreseeable.  Any serious student
> of geopolitics knows that the rule of law is the fundamental precursor
> to a functioning democracy - institutions, culture, accepted norms...
> need to be shaped and accepted thoroughly over generations.  Our own
> democracy did not drop out of the sky in 1776, it was a product of
> centuries of British history.  As the already sixty year rise of South
> Korea, Japan, Singapore, etc. reveal, the transition from rule of law
> to democracy occurs in different ways in different cultures, and
> typically takes several decades, not months.
>
>    As the recent election reveals, Iraq might very well be on that
> path of transition at last, but I hope our leaders finally understand
> that it will happen in Iraqi fashion, and will likely be a
> decades-long process.  So hopefully we will ask ourselves whether we
> want to take the ride with them, or if we have found a good spot to
> get off.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:287468
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to