Well, why was it OK for you to scream foul then, but not for others to question the list now?
I think Bruce summed it up quite nicely. It seems that the rules are different depending on who is involved. If a group of white guys put together a list of potential candidates and they were all white, Sharpton and others would be up in arms about how its racist. White, black, Muslim, Jew, whatever...if you have a list of people and they all have a similar trairt (liek religion, race, gender, etc), its biased and its bullshit. Now way a Muslim will always be the best person, nor white, nor male, nor Jew..I think you get the point. On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Larry Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > >And I bet you sat quitely and did not voice your opinion? My point was not > >that it didn;t happen, but that it did nopt happen without people getting > up > >in arms (as they should have - and as I think they should now). > > > > Nope I did object, especially when unqualified republican idiots were put > into positions of authority making decisions over scientific research. > > Another thing to consider which the other posts by some did not mention, > how many of these people on your objectionable list have been appointed. BTW > why so offended, is it because they were Islamic? Last I looked none of > these people have been appointed to a federal job. At this point in the > first Shrub term, there were over 50 from equivalent lists from Focus on the > Family and several right to life groups who were already appointed to > equivalent positions. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:293875 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
