>Well, why was it OK for you to scream foul then, but not for others to >question the list now?
Did I ever say that? Moreover how many of those people have been appointed? Now compare that to Shrub Term 1 or Term 2? Within 2 weeks of the start of term 1 political appointees in the NIH were already had put up misleading information regarding abortions and breast cancer on the NIH website. How many compatible incidents have occurred with the Obama administration. Or for that matter the misleading information that was put up by the EPA involving mountain top removal coal mining, that was put up within weeks of Bush's taking the oath of office. You want me to continue, I have enough cases that its no anecdotal information but approaches fairly solid policies. > >I think Bruce summed it up quite nicely. It seems that the rules are >different depending on who is involved. If a group of white guys put >together a list of potential candidates and they were all white, Sharpton >and others would be up in arms about how its racist. White, black, Muslim, >Jew, whatever...if you have a list of people and they all have a similar >trairt (liek religion, race, gender, etc), its biased and its bullshit. Now >way a Muslim will always be the best person, nor white, nor male, nor Jew..I >think you get the point. So have you put on your white hood yet? That comment is so extreme I simply don't know where to begin. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:293898 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
