Who has talked about doing nothing? We've been debating this topic for quite awhile, and as far back as I can remember, no one has ever argued for doing nothing. Everyone seems to agree that moving to cleaner sources of energy is a good thing. Beyond that, though, there is significant disagreement about the importance of man-made climate change and the need for immediate action. Gruss used to throw around a $50 billion number that we needed to spend immediately on research; I guess in the current political climate you might as well ask for $100 billion. The Chinese are paying for most of it anyway, so why not go for broke?
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Michael G wrote: > > How is that an argument for doing nothing? > We also might get hit with a giant asteroid therefore why bother trying to > fix the economy? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:294038 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
