this just touches a nerve with me whenever I see people who use  
language X to do everything because all they know is language X (I'm  
not directing this at you)......mainly it's the VB guy that I work who  
really irks me in this way :)


On Apr 22, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Michael Grant wrote:

>
> Though I would think the time to download, install, learn and write  
> the
> regex would go against the original request of "How would you go  
> about this
> quickly." I guess I just assummed he wanted it done right away vs.  
> the best
> way.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I didn't miss the point at all.  If you would use something like grep
>> (or astrogrep for win32) you'd get the job done as quick or quicker.
>> You'd also have gained knowledge on how to use another tool.  Next
>> time you were presented with a similar challenge, you'd be able to
>> pick the correct tool.
>>
>>
>> On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We aren't building an enterprise app here, we're dealing with a one-
>>> off
>>> that's localized. If you can whip up a quick cf process in a couple
>>> lines of
>>> code that does the trick IMO it's better than a scalable "proper"
>>> tool.
>>>
>>> Look at it this way:
>>>
>>> What's your boss going to prefer? The "right way" that took half a
>>> day to
>>> implement or the "wrong way" where you're done in 10 minutes and get
>>> the
>>> same result?
>>>
>>> Everyone seems to be missing the subjective point to argue the
>>> objective
>>> best practice principles of parsing a text file.
>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, using an application server on a single user to parse text
>>>> files
>>>> is in no way quick or efficient.  There are much better tools
>>>> available to do this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 22, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still going to disagree based on what Ian's details were:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Single user system.
>>>>> - Scaled to "several dozens of files"
>>>>> - 1K to 1MB ( I used a 20x larger file for my test so it's  
>>>>> probably
>>>>> closer
>>>>> to 1 second to do a 1MB file)
>>>>> - Quick and efficient.
>>>>>
>>>>> check, check, check and check.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given, if you were looking at scanning hundreds or thousands of
>>>>> these files
>>>>> repeatedly then perhaps DSN is the way. But for this solution I
>>>>> think it's
>>>>> just too bulky and way more work than is neccessary. It would take
>>>>> longer to
>>>>> set up a single DSN than to scan two dozen 1MB files. That's just
>>>>> sillyness.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Robert Munn <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Michael Grant <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So 12.6 seconds to loop over a 20MB text file certainly doesn't
>>>>>>> "choke a
>>>>>> cf
>>>>>>> server." I _highly_ doubt you could even set up the dsn in that
>>>>>>> amount of
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this is a one-time thing on a single-user system, your  
>>>>>> solution
>>>>>> is fine,
>>>>>> but it isn't going to scale. If Ian needs to perform the  
>>>>>> operation
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> than
>>>>>> once, he's better off setting up a DSN and running a query.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:295757
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to