>http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/05/13/sexy-female-artifact.html > >" > >Although tiny -- just over two inches long -- the intentionally headless >figurine is remarkably detailed, with pronounced genitalia visible between >open legs. > >"As one male colleague remarked, nothing has changed in 40,000 years," >Nicholas Conard, who reported the find and led the project, told Discovery >News."
Makes sense to me it fits in perfectly with what my archeologist friend has speculated. The so called fertility figures found in many neolithic and paleolithic sites in Europe are really pron. It also fits in with the idea that the earliest adapters of any new display type technology is the pornography industry. These figurines are a good example. When printing first occurred, books of porn were another early product, right after Gutenburg's bible. (in a twisted sense it fits, with all that "begetting" in the bible). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:297190 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
