It's working fine for me (ff 3.0.11) And yes, I too hope it gets better over time.
I like the image of the manuscript. I like that the "filled in" text versus the actual physical paper is easily seen. I like the ability to easily turn off "boxes". Since the transcription is not that useful, I turned it off (making the translation bigger). But that interface had everything I wanted to do with the image, all available in one screen. And I liked the handling of the different language options in that right tab set. Overall, a good "manuscript" site. Do you have examples of better ones (I suddenly am very interested in how old old old documents are preserved and shared). On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I love the idea. I hate the site. The boxes with the transcriptions > and translations are too small to be useful, and the viewer doesn't > work most of the time when you change pages. Maybe it will get > better. > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Jerry Johnson<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Very neat idea - very neat site. > > > > http://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/codex/ > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299503 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
