Is it possible for you to ever rebut something without coming across as a pompous ass?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Gruss Gott<[email protected]> wrote: > >> RoMunn wrote: >> What, are you standing in for Gruss or something? No one said we should toss >> out all other research on the subject. What I have specifically said is that >> our ability to influence the planetary climate is minimal compared to the >> forces of nature that have been at work on the planet since its inception >> billions of years ago. Anyone who says different is peddling something. >> > > Oh heck. I'll jump in: > > The beauty of your logic on this issue is in the recursion. Here's what it > is: > > "We DON'T know anything, therefore we KNOW that X is true." > > See how goofy that sounds? You can simultaneous say we know nothing > therefore we know our influence is less than blah blah blah. > > No logic in that. > > Either we know or we don't. If we don't know, then your conclusion is > just as false. > > Further, let me give you an example of how you'd STILL be wrong even > if you're supposition was right: > > Let's say you get hit by a Mac truck going 50mph. You'll die. Let's > say I punch you in the face as hard as I can. You'll die. > > Now granted a Mac truck will hit you with more force than I will, but > you die either way. > > So your logic is both recursive AND wrong even if we accept your recursion. > > You're a mess on this dude. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300055 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
