really ;) I am also quite curious. The site I asked about appears to work now, with a full page of what to click if you are running aol, what settings to change for netscape, etc. Speaking of 1998.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Michael Grant <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is it clear text or can you at least submit and encryption key for the post > back data? > What data do they return on post back? > > This has me very intrested (read: violently ill) > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > I was just recently implementing subscriptions (recurring payments) > > with Authorize.net > > > > First off, you can't test them in Test Mode. Which seems to defeat the > > purpose of Test Mode, but whatever. I'll run a couple of $0.01 > > transactions on my card for testing. > > > > Authorize.net has a setup where you give them a URL to post all of the > > subsequent transaction information to. So you initially set up the > > subscription, make sure it is good, then every month they try running > > the card, then post back to your URL and tell you if it succeeded or > > not. > > > > Cool, not too difficult, right? Well, we tested it and the first 5 > > post backs we got generated HTTP 500 errors in IIS. Nothing logged on > > our side. Well, crap. So we we pull all the real code and decide to > > just do logging code, log whatever they send us. Obviously we > > misunderstood their API docs and are binding to something incorrectly. > > > > Then...nothing. Authorize.net stops doing post backs to us. We submit > > more test subscriptions and get...nothing. Get ahold of them to find > > out what's up and they research the matter. > > > > They come back and tell us that the problem is that they don't support > > doing post backs to https. They don't support sending financial > > information over ssl. Really. And those 5 post backs they did to our > > https address that generated the 500 error code? No clue. According to > > them, it should never have worked even that much. And, oh yeah, maybe > > they shouldn't let us submit a url that they claim they can't do a > > post to. They have not a single clue as to why it tried 5 times then > > stopped trying. > > > > Fuckin brilliant > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Michael Grant<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The only reason I can come up with is that the web department in > question > > is > > > full of donkeys. No SSL is _so_ 1998. Seriously, whoever implemented a > > site > > > like that should be shot. Or at the very least maimed. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300077 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
