What's you point? All or nothing? If he agrees with one thing asshole said he has to agree with all of it?
Or by this : > I challenge you to fault his facts mostly because you can't. If one prediction - not fact - is agreed upon GG wins? I just pointed to an article that disputes Taibbi's facts, because I was challenged to. I didn't even read the RS article, can't lower myself that much. I think it's funny that Taibbi is worse than Coulter, Limbaugh and Beck combined and Gruss loves him :P On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Vivec<[email protected]> wrote: > > What do you understand by this statement: > > "That being said, there are two good points that come out of this. > First is his prediction that cap-and-trade will prove to be the next > bubble or at least market for financial chicanery. Of this we have > little doubt, and it's why Goldman and GE are so eager to create this > new market where none currently exists." > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300180 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
