of course they are edited; compare the transcripts to the videos. Look at the videos! Where did the voiceover and editorial text come from?
Possibly they are not doctored, but I did not see a story when I was looking around last night that ACORN had said so. However, since you started saying that I have been workng from the assumption that this is true, though I personally am not convinced yet. Have *you* looked at these videos at all? In Washington she says she's trying to get these girls away from an abusive pimp. In Brooklyn she talks about other working girls but does not say they are underage. The one in San Bernardino is already discredited so I did not bother with that. If there is a fifth video it was not up on the BigGovernment side yesterday evening. On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Have you seen all five videos yet? The ones that ACORN have admitted are > NOT edited? There is more to them than just which tax table to use. > > Dana wrote: > > haven't found a code of ethics yet, but, an incidental find -- if you > start > > from ok this person has income she has to report and she is not an > employee, > > yet she performs services for her income, then she *is* a business. Look > at > > http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040sc.pdf . They are making a big deal > out > > of the tax preparer trying to determine which code from the table > starting > > on C-9 they should use. I mean, Sam, Bruce, which one would *you* use? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:304352 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
