you really don't listen, do you. There are only so many times I can tell you that I don't think they should have been so helpful to people promoting child abuse before I decide that you're a total moron.
However. For purposes of the tax form and the tax form only, what would youu suggest the would be? Inventory? I mean seriously. Also if you had WATCHED the video you are so all-fired upset about you would know she did not in fact suggest that. She thought about suggesting it, which is creepy, and decided not. Thinking about it is bad enough, and reason to fire her, but not (imho, and IANAL) tax fraud. If she did not in fact misunderstand the income amount and was instead saying no no *this* is your income, now *that* would be tax fraud. I have wasted hours on this bullshit and it stops here. It's not as though you were actually doing any more than regurgitating Glenn Beck. On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > One woman was telling the 'pimp' to declare the young girls from El > Salvador as his dependents. You really see nothing wrong with that? At > all? Maybe even just a little bit? > > The fucking CEO of ACORN called them 'indefensible' and you continue > to try and defend them. > > And, since I knew you would ask...here ya go - http://snurl.com/ry10n > - First paragraph. > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > IF is a big word in this context. And the jury is still out. After > watching > > the video -- which no-one else here seems to have done -- I think she was > > going with what she heard. She heard wrong, but that's not fraud. Watch > the > > video. The "prostitute" says 8000 and she repeats 800. Perhaps I am > looking > > at it wrong, but I've at least looked at it, which you all definitely > should > > have done if you were going to try to prove a conspiracy with it. But oh > > yeah, you know they are seeking the downfall of civilization, so > naturally > > they participate in child abuse. > > > > None so blind. > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Yeah it is if it's helping them defraud the government > >> > >> Again: > >> > >> > http://www.irstaxsupport.com/rialto-tax-preparers-get-prison-fines-after-defrauding-irs/ > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > you guys just want to snicker about the sex stuff. I don't like the > way > >> it > >> > was handled, but helping them to file a return is not illegal, as far > as > >> I > >> > can tell. Usual caveats apply. > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:304401 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
